Archive:

Day: November 9, 2015

What is the most minimal language?

By: | Post date: 2015-11-09 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: General Language, Linguistics

Artificial languages are where you’d look of course, and there are much simpler languages than Esperanto. Basic English was renowned for having a small vocab. My own favourite, with a comparably small vocab and a much tighter grammar, is Interglossa (as opposed to its revival Glosa). Natural semantic metalanguage has an extremely small number of […]

In Indo-European languages using a Latin alphabet, what’s up with these two letters “ch” that are pronounced (phonetics) so differently?

By: | Post date: 2015-11-09 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: English, Other Languages, Writing Systems

Roman alphabet digraphs were invented with the digraphs Latin used to represent Greek aspirated letters: <ch th ph>. So <ch> was available very very early on to languages using the Roman alphabet, to represent new sounds. Palatal sounds are notoriously unstable phonologically: once /k/ goes to [c] (as it did in late Latin), it can […]

Can you say anything using a vocabulary of 100 words?

By: | Post date: 2015-11-09 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: General Language, Linguistics

The claim of Natural semantic metalanguage is that you can with around 60. It was a party trick of Australian linguistics undergrads to speak in NSM; it becomes very stilted very quickly, but in principle you can define a lot of notions with a limited vocabulary, as the asker alludes to. NSM is of course […]

  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Join 311 other subscribers

  • November 2015
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct   Dec »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30