Linguistically speaking, why is the relationship between the signifier and signified mostly arbitrary?

By: | Post date: 2016-12-28 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: General Language, Linguistics

Vote #1 Michael Minnich: Michael Minnich’s answer to Linguistically speaking, why is the relationship between the signifier and signified mostly arbitrary? It brings up several pertinent reasons.

My answer’s simpler: restricting ourselves to lexicon, non-arbitrary signifier–signified relations in a spoken language are going to be limited to referents that make a sound. Most verbs and adjectives and abstract nouns defy onomatopoeia. Even with concrete nouns, what’s the onomatopoeia for “hair”? “sun”? “fish”?

Even if we broaden things to include indexical signs and sound symbolism, there are real limits to how much can be signified by a non-arbitrtary signifier in a sound-based language. The limits will be enough to prevent you having a real communicative language—even if you don’t move up from lexicon to syntax.

Leave a Reply

  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Join 324 other subscribers

  • June 2023
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  
%d bloggers like this: