What is “does the bear shit in the woods” an example of in language?

By: | Post date: 2017-07-25 | Comments: No Comments
Posted in categories: English, Linguistics

Aside from being a rhetorical question, it is also a Conventional Implicature: the primary meaning of the phrase is “this is obvious”, even though this is not the literal meaning of the phrase, and that meaning replies from Gricean maxims of conversation. (“What does ursine defecation have to do with my question as a counterquestion? Ah, it is a vividly expressed exemplar of something obvious…”)

(See Nick Nicholas’ answer to How is it possible that we perceive irony? for more on Conventional and Conversational Implicatures.)

The term got to be a conventional implicature, in turn, by virtue of being vivid language, which sticks as a mental image. In particular, it is an instance (literally) of scatology.

Answered 2017-07-25 · Upvoted by

Logan R. Kearsley and

Steve Rapaport, Linguistics PhD candidate at Edinburgh. Has lived in USA, Sweden, Italy, UK.

Leave a Reply

  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Join 302 other subscribers

  • October 2018
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
%d bloggers like this: